Paddy P<span id="more-3092"></span>ower Forced to Pull Offensive Oscar Pistorius Ad by Ad Authority

After having a record range complaints, a Paddy Power ad that featured alleged murderer Oscar Pistorius will be pulled.

After fielding accurate documentation 5,200 complaints, Irish bookmaker Paddy Power has been forced to pull an offensive ad from its UK publications, since well to be investigated by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). The ad which many felt at best trivialized the current and ongoing murder trial of Paralympian Oscar Pistorius, and at worst exploited it for profit was ordered down early in the day this week by the ASA after being inundated with input from horrified citizens.

Making Light of Pistorius Murder Trial

The printing ad which had starred in the press that is UK, in addition to on the Paddy Power website and social media marketing feeds offered chances on the upshot of the trial stating:


Pistorius’ face appeared photoshopped onto an Oscar statuette a reference to the recently aired Academy Awards, which were held in la once the murder trial got underway in South Africa. According to over 122,000 signatories of a online petition, however, Pistorius’ girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp’s alleged murder in February 2013 at the arms of her boyfriend should be no laughing matter.

‘A young woman has been killed,’ said Jean Hatchet, organizer of the petition. ‘There ‘s no doubt that she was killed by this man, whether or not he intended to kill her.’ The Paddy Power advertising, she says, is ‘an incredibly awful, callous thing.’

It was said by the ASA would publish its findings and proffer any sanctions in due course. Meanwhile, the business was clear in its disdain for the message.

‘We consider the ad may be seriously prejudicial to the public that is general the ground for the likely further serious and/or widespread offence it may cause,’ noted an ASA-issued statement that was released by the middle of week. ‘We are also concerned that the reputation that is good of advertising industry may be further damaged by continued publication of the ad.’

Paddy Power noted that the print campaign was just meant to perform together with the other day’s Oscars anyway, and claimed it only ran once in A uk paper sunday. Although the ASA said the Ireland-based business’s internet site had been away from its jurisdiction, a go through the site by late this week showed no trace of the ad whatsoever, nor any mention of its presence ever. A search regarding the company’s website’s betting options additionally revealed no matches for the word ‘Pistorius,’ though whether that indicates the bet is off is anyone’s guess.

Perhaps Not the First Offensive Ad from Paddy Energy

Paddy Power with a history of this kind of risqué marketing campaign remained defiant, but seemed to completely miss the moral dimension, telling media: ‘Trial wagering generally speaking isn’t a common incident, but there’s certainly nothing new about wagering on the end result of probably the most high-profile court instances and they do not come any more high-profile than this. Given the rolling coverage of this trial, pretty much everyone will be speaing frankly about it and speculating on the verdict. We’re therefore anticipating a number of our customers to desire to place their cash where their lips is.’

Hatchet has requested that the profits produced from the Pistorius bet should be donated to women’s charities, to which Paddy Power retorted: ‘We’re providing betting on the upshot of a trial. It’s about whether Pistorius are going to be found guilty or not guilty, it isn’t a wagering market on domestic physical violence.’

It is far from 1st of several Paddy Power campaigns that deliberately seeks to court controversy.

The business was as soon as forced to pull billboard posters that showed Jesus and the Apostles gambling at the Last Supper. And this season, A tv spot that showed a blind soccer player kicking a cat into a tree was the absolute most complained about spot for the 12 months. The decision was additionally designed to pull another TV spot that featured transvestites at a battle meet, and invited its customers to ‘spot the stallions among the mares’.

Of course, Paddy Power has achieved its objective that is real once: to force its brand name into the papers and acquire people talking about its marketing campaigns. Nevertheless, at any given time when politicians in the united kingdom are questioning the level of gambling ads on tv which they state can quickly be considered by minors, this really is publicity that the gambling industry could probably do without.

Night Junior Middleweight Champ Molina Jailed Before MGM Garden Fight

Current IBF Junior Middleweight champ Carlos Molina during players paradise slots cheats the MGM Grand Garden Arena back on Sept. 14, 2013. Molina is hoping to be released with time for Saturday’s match against undefeated Jermall Charlo. (Image: Mark Hundley/Las Vegas Sun)

UPDATE March 8, 2014: Carlos Molina was not released from Clark County Detention Center on and the Saturday MGM Grand Garden Arena fight was cancelled friday. It appears the reason that is primary because technically Molina is known as an illegal alien and was wanted by immigration officials, despite having lived in the U.S. since age four.

‘He’s not leaving jail to fight, and we don’t understand as he is getting out,’ said Warriors Boxing promoter Leon Margules in an ESPN interview. ‘It’s because of his immigration status. He’s an illegal alien.’


It’s a development that has promoters and bookmakers chewing through their finger nails: Carlos ‘King’ Molina’s scheduled defense of his IBF junior middleweight globe title battle at the MGM Grand Garden Saturday against undefeated opponent Jermall Charlo may not go ahead because Molina was nevertheless in jail release that is awaiting we went along to press on Friday’s weigh-in day.

Arrested on Outstanding Warrants

Molina was arrested shortly after his press conference at the MGM Grand earlier in the week on a fugitive warrant, stemming from a 2007 parole violation for failing to register as a sex offender. In 2002, he had been convicted of second-degree assault on a minor in Outgamie, Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, it has also emerged that Appleton, Wisconsin police have disorderly conduct warrant out for him, dating back in to 2005.

On Thursday morning, Clark County prosecutor Bart Pace consented to set Molina’s bail at $10,000 with the contract of Wisconsin authorities; but, as Molina’s representatives scrambled to secure his release with time for the bout against challenger Jermall Charlo, he still needs to clear an immigration hold (he had been created in Mexico, but has lived in the usa since age four), and currently remains in Clark County Detention Center Las Vegas’ main holding lockdown for bad boys.

Molina’s promoter, Leon Margules, said: ‘ an agreement was made by us with Wisconsin for the fighter’s release in the sex offender registration violation. The immigration problem is more complicated. I’m still trying to find out exactly why Carlos is being held. I’m hopeful we can get it solved, get him released and obtain him within the ring Saturday. He told me he’s supporting well, but he wants to get out and he wishes to fight Saturday.’

Monday puts that are hearing in Doubt

The fact that records show that his next hearing has been set for this coming Monday throws that into doubt while authorities initially said they expected the boxer to be released in time for the fight.

At a press meeting on Thursday, Richard Schaefer, CEO of Golden Boy Promotions, stayed upbeat: ‘I’m waiting to hear from Molina’s people,’ he stated. ‘They’re handling all of Molina’s issues. We need not create a choice on the fight before the weigh-in (Friday). But I know Carlos desires to fight. He’s very anxious to get in the band and he’s really fired up.’

However, Schaefer revealed that, should they fail to spring the miscreant champion from his jail cell, he has a back-up plan: ‘Just in case, this is for the pay-per-view audience to understand … then we’d, of program, have actually the luxury of upgrading Ricardo Alvarez against Thompson to the pay-per-view card. if that fight does maybe not happen,’

While people may be covered regardless, it’s a total headache for the bookmakers, obviously: collectively, huge amount of money in wagers pass through their fingers on big Vegas battle nights and should this bout fail to materialize those bets might have become returned.

Meanwhile, Molina’s opponent is wanting to keep a clear head: ‘When I first heard it, I didn’t think it,’ said Charlo. ‘I thought my trainer [Ronnie Shields] was joking. But I’m going to help keep everything that is doing same way as if we’re going to fight. I will stay concentrated. I am going in which to stay form. I’m not going to be distracted.’

Downtown Grand Sued When Man Loses $500K in Alleged Blackout State

Weekend 52-year-old Mark Johnston from Los Angeles is suing the Downtown Grand in Las Vegas, after losing $500K wagering on Super Bowl. Johnston claims he had been blacked out and did not know just what he was doing. (Image: CNN)

Did there is a Super that is rough Bowl, wagering-wise? Perhaps you bet regarding the Broncos, or even the blowout took all the life out of your Super Bowl celebration. Whatever the case are, then you didn’t have the sort of issues faced by one severe gambler in Las Vegas, whom states he lost $500,000 over that weekend he was doing while he was far too inebriated to know what.

Blackout Drunk Continued to Wager

That man 52-year-old Mark Johnston, from Los Angeles says that the Downtown Grand in nevada’ Fremont Street area permitted him to gamble while he was clearly drunk; blackout drunk, based on his or her own assessment. That lead to him losing fifty per cent of a million dollars at the pai blackjack and gow tables.

‘I feel like they picked my pouches,’ said Johnston, a retiree from Ca. ‘we feel you reach in his pockets and grab all his money like they took a drunk guy…like a drunk guy walking down the street, and.

‘I am not really a loser that is sore. I’ve lost fifty per cent of a million. I have lost 800,000. I’ve lost bundle. This has nothing at all to do with that. Clearly we can afford what I destroyed,’ said Johnston, who nonetheless refuses to classify himself as a ‘whale’ the industry term for a high-roller.

Johnston formerly owned A california that is southern car, and now owns a Mercedes-Benz worth $250,000; making his modesty regarding his gambling status a tad disingenuous.

He has not blacked out previously, he also claims to have been served 20-30 drinks, making one wonder how he can remember that, but not his gambling play per se although he claims. Nevertheless the rich aren’t richer than we are because they are doingn’t learn how to play hardball, and Johnston isn’t any exception to that rule; he appears happy to play the victim card in this scenario.

‘This is about you nearly killing me personally. What if I had gone to bed that night, with all those drinks in me, and I threw up on myself and I choked and passed away?’ Johnston said, having a dramatic flair that people can just admire from afar. That being stated, also he fesses up to having had as 10 beverages while visiting Vegas and in the limo before he even hit the video gaming floor.

‘ My obligation is, look, I’d some beverages at the airport, on the air plane. At some point, that’s my obligation,’ the gambler said. ‘The unfortunate component than I actually do. about this for them is, they’ve a bigger obligation’

In accordance with Johnston’s attorney Sean Lyttle, The Grand is countersuing in an attempt to get his client’s debts; although other media sources have reported that the casino has wanted to settle at a 20 percent discount $400K but that Johnston will not go that route. Meanwhile, Johnston has placed a stop-payment order regarding the debt re payments The Grand had been attempting to collect, and it is suing them for damaging his reputation.

Nevada Law Places Onus on Casinos

It ends up that per Nevada law casinos are, in reality, banned from allowing gamblers that are visibly drunk continuing to wager cash. They are also supposed to take off the drinks that are free they can tell someone has received one a lot of. The area that is grey can be who determines what comprises exactly how many, and by what criteria. After all, if Johnston surely could place wagers also in a blackout state, he might be in as he claims how was the casino to know what impaired state?

However, regulatory authorities are taking the instance quite seriously. So whilst The Grand will not comment on pending litigation, Nevada’s Gaming Control Board is apparently investigating the case one that Lyttle claims is quite unusual.

‘It’s certainly a case that is extraordinary’ Lyttle said. ‘ This is not a whole tale that I’ve ever heard before, where someone was blackout intoxicated where they could not read their cards, yet a casino continued to serve them beverages and issue them more markers. It’s an extremely heavy-handed and uncommon approach that we have actuallyn’t seen in this town in a number of years.’

According to Johnston, he’s a normal in nevada and was invited to The Grand for Super Bowl along with his girlfriend, though he mostly gambled on his own weekend. His lawsuit alleges that The Grand provided him lots of free drinks after he previously already been drinking at supper, and that he didn’t understand how much he had lost until Sunday.

While Johnston lost big over Super Bowl weekend, he wasn’t the only person. The Nevada sportsbooks won nearly $20 million from gamblers on the NFL’s championship game this year after a record amount of betting with most of the public money on the Broncos.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *